projectagape
New Benchmarks for Group Fundraising
Last week, The Case Foundation published official statistics and a message about America’s Giving Challenge and The Causes Giving Challenge.
Here's an excerpt from the message:
Has “small-dollar” philanthropy reached its tipping point as an effective way to raise funds and bring new people to the table? That’s what the Case Foundation, along with partners Parade Magazine, Causes on Facebook, Network for Good, and Global Giving, wanted to answer when it launched the America’s Giving Challenge and the Causes Giving Challenge.
Both were designed to introduce millions of people to newer, more convenient, and more efficient forms of civic engagement. Specifically, the Challenges focused on how people could use simple Web 2.0 tools and social networking strategies to put their own passions to work on behalf of their favorite charities and causes.
In the end, these citizen philanthropists encouraged more than 80,000 people to make donations to nearly 700 nonprofits, and raised more than $2.5 million for the nonprofits represented.
While the overall numbers are impressive, the detailed statistics are perhaps the most useful to nonprofits. (Note: The numbers below represent The Case Foundation's findings as of 26 February 2008. Changes may be published in the coming weeks).
Number of "Charity Badges" Created
Network for Good: 1,810
GlobalGiving: 672
Facebook Causes:3,936
Average Donation Amount
Network for Good: $24.50
GlobalGiving: $25.07
Facebook Causes:$17.38
Highest Number of Donations (in one day)
Network for Good: 5,408
GlobalGiving: 2,837
Facebook Causes:7,820
Highest Number of Donations (in one week)
Network for Good: 19,545
GlobalGiving: 8,891
Facebook Causes:16,252
Largest Single Donation
Network for Good: $9,700
GlobalGiving: $5,000
Facebook Causes:$2,000
Total Amount Raised:
Network for Good: $866,026
Global Giving: $335,186
Facebook Causes:$571,686
Number of Unique Donors
Network for Good: 33,208
GlobalGiving: 12,836
Facebook Causes:27,094
Total Number of Donations
Network for Good: 35,348
GlobalGiving: 13,370
Facebook Causes:32,886
Number of Nonprofits Who Received Support
Network for Good: 481
GlobalGiving: 125
Facebook Causes:747
In June 2007, I compiled benchmark figures for group fundraising based on the statistics from five social action platforms: SixDegrees, GiveMeaning, JustGive.org, ChipIn, and Firstgiving. The chart below presents the figures from America's Giving Challenge and The Causes Giving Challenge in comparison to those benchmark figures.
June America's Giving Challenge (NetworkforGood) Average donation amount $43.30 $24.50 $25.07 $17.38 Average amount raised per campaign $692.80 $478.47 $499.78 $145.25 Average number of contributors per campaign 16 20 20 8
2007 Benchmark
(Facebook)
- 1 comment
- 611 reads
Kings of Philanthropy and Princes of Micro-Philanthropy
In July 2007, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) posted two radio documentaries about the philanthropy of Bill Gates, Warren Buffet, Jeff Skoll, and other billionaires. The recordings originally appeared on a radio program entitled Ideas. The two part series is called "The Kings of Philanthropy" (part i and part ii).
Here's a brief description:
Some have called it the natural fall-out of a hyper-capitalist society; billionaires who've made more money from media and technology enterprises than anyone in human history. There's Bill Gates, the creator of Microsoft; Jeff Skoll, the founder of e-Bay; and, of course, Warren Buffet, who has been dubbed the "Oracle of Omaha." Now, they've reinvented themselves as philanthropists, giving away billions to help the poor. Freelance broadcaster Richard Phinney asks: can they re-make the world?
What's interesting about these podcasts is that they discuss the work of Bill Gates, Warren Buffet and Jeff Skoll in terms of a generational shift in attitudes toward philanthropy. These billionaires, according to the reporter, represent a new wave of philanthropists, wealthy grant-makers who emphasize transplanted business practices and social entrepreneurship over charitable giving for purely humanitarian relief.
"The Kings of Philanthropy" is an excellent documentary and casts new light on the work of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in particular. But from my perspective, the philanthropists described in this program (perhaps Jeff Skoll aside) represent an 'older' generation of philanthropy, one in which great wealth is amassed first and distributed later.
"The Princes (and Princesses) of Micro-Philanthropy" are from generation Y. They are the founders of sites like GiveMeaning, DonorsChoose, Change.org, and Project Agape. They write blogs like Tactical Philanthropy. And create mash-ups like the Social Actions search engine. The young people behind these sites have committed themselves to changing the institutions of philanthropy, with or without huge amounts of money, and certainly before reaching middle-age.
Next time the CBC does an investigative report on new trends in philanthropy, I think they should look to the off-spring of Boomers. That's where they'll find the greatest generational shift in attitudes toward philanthropy.
Here are some leads:
- Charles Best, Founder of DonorsChoose
- Tom Williams, Founder of GiveMeaning
- Ben Rattray, Founder of Change.org
- Sean Parker and Joe Green, Founders of Project Agape
- Andrew Mason, Founder of ThePoint
- Frerieke van Bree, Founder of Umeebee
- Julius Huijnk, Founder of Helpalot
- Colleen Marlow, Soon-to-be foudner of ArtHead (read her blog)
- Philippe Bradley, Soon-to-be founder of a platform for prize philanthropy
- Sean Stannard-Stockton, Author of a blog called Tactical Philanthropy
- Heather Cronk, Spokesperson for PledgeBank in North America
- Myself, Founder of Social Actions
As far as I know, everyone listed above is under 30, and often well-under 30.
A moment ago I referred to them as the The Princes (and Princesses) of Micro-Philanthropy. But come to think of it, since the aim is to democratize philanthropy, I should abandon feudal language altogether.
If you know of other young people using the web to democratize philanthropy, please post their names and projects below.
- 6 comments
- 887 reads
Project Agape: Brotherly Love, But Limited to Facebook

Facebook Co-Founders: Sean Parker and Joe GreenContribute Magazine has posted an interview with the co-founders of Facebook Causes, Sean Parker & Joe Green. The duo has founded a company called Project Agape, which seeks to spread the practice of micro-philanthropy through social networks. According to their website, the word Agape is ancient greek for "brotherly love, or a selfless regard for other human beings".
Facebook Causes is the first and only project of Project Agape. The application allows any Facebook user to raise money for a nonprofit or U.S. politician by posting a fundraising widget on their Facebook profile and inviting friends to join the cause.
With three million users, Sean and Joe appear to be succeeding in spreading brotherly love. But their brotherly love project is limited to Facebook users. Considering that Facebook tends to appeal to well-educated upper-class over-achievers, I wonder how much love can actually spread before the system begs to overflow onto the broader world wide web.
Here's an idea: Why doesn't Project Agape publish a RSS feed of new causes created through their Facebook application? If they did this, Social Actions would be able to aggregate new causes alongside social change campaigns created on other social action platforms. New causes would then start showing up in the Social Actions search engine. Everyone would beneifit. Sean and Joe, are you out there? Can you hear this request? Or should I post a message on your Facebook profile?
Below are a few excerpts from the interview with Contribute Magazine:
So why Causes?
SEAN: I think it’s a pretty natural evolution.The perception that social networking has been frivolous, I think, has existed amongst non-core Facebook users for awhile, and certainly most of the applications up until now have been pretty frivolous. They’ve been about socializing, not socializing for a cause.
JOE: When you look at Facebook and social networking in general, it sort of heralds a fundamental change in how community works online. Before social networking, before Friendster, community online was very niche and very disconnected. You had StarWars fans, and they got online and found other Star Wars fans, and their identity was sort of a handle. They were Hans Solo, or whomever. But it wasn’t them and there was no real connection to their real life. Then Facebook came along, and it’s about real people and real lives. A person’s profile contains his or her real photo and a real name. To convince your friends that I’m you would be pretty much impossible.Facebook creates this very trusted identity. And so what you’ve got now with Facebook is what (cofounder) Mark Zuckerberg likes to call the social graph — people connectedto other people’s friends. It’s a map of social connections. What that allows you to do is to take things that are real-world and put them on this space and have them work far, far more efficiently.
...
This is a for-profit business, right?
JOE: Both of us have come to this primarily for social reasons. We did consider being a nonprofit but to do this at the scale we wanted to do it, it had to be for-profit. But our primary motive is to empower individuals and to make the nonprofit process a lot more efficient. So our business model right now is that we can raise money very cheaply. Nonprofits are spending a lot of money hiring firms to do direct mail and phone. It’s costing them 30 to 40 percent of what they take in — and it’s locking out smaller nonprofits who don’t have the institutional machinery to raise money in that way — and then it also locks out smaller donors, especially young people who can afford to write a $50 check once a year, but nobody ever asks. We, though, take a very small percentage of the transaction. The entire transaction cost on Facebook Causes is 4 percent, which, compared to what nonprofits pay now, is a pretty good bargain.
...
So where do you both see this going?
JOE: We’ve been very focused on growth right now — just getting the application used by as many people as possible. We’re also going to be working on building out a lot more types of actions people can take and various ways to raise money around a cause. One of the real powers of the Internet, though, is rich media. You have the power to make a cause real for someone. Instead of saying, ‘end malaria,” you can show someone what it means to give a bed net to a child. You can say, after watching a video, ‘Give us ten bucks, and you’ll save the life of one child by buying one bed net.’ You’re much more likely to get someone to give that way.
SEAN: What’s interesting about Facebook, and distinguishes it even from My-Space is that it’s so incredibly real. Causes is all about sort of broadening that concept of identity to include one’s higher calling, if you will — what you think about, your values, your beliefs, your sense of social purpose and mission. Second Life is about virtual identities. Facebook is about real identity, real relationships. There’s a much deeper social capital on Facebook than, say, something like Second Life.
JOE: When I was a student at Harvard, we did a study twice a year about college student civic involvement and what we consistently found was that this generation of college students cares incredibly deeply about changing the world, and probably has expressed more interest, infact, in that of any generation since the 60s but doesn’t understand how to do it and feels that the existing institutions really are not responding to them.
We think we can show people that young people can make a difference. I mean you look at this one breast cancer cause now on Facebook. It has amassed more than a million members in seven or eight weeks. I mean, it’s pretty hard to argue that this young guy who started it hasn’t made some kind of impact. He’s not the Susan G. Komen foundation. He’s one guy trying to get a breast cancer study funded at Brigham and Women’s Hospital up in Boston. He’s already raised something like $40,000 so far for that cause. It’s not big money — yet. But by exposing people to the power of their social networks, it can be.
Anybody can create what we call a cause; a cause can be about anything —Save The Whales, Pave My Street, Elect John Edwards, whatever. People are donating $10, $20, and there are some who have given thousands of dollars so far.
Continue reading the interview with Facebook Causes co-founders Sean Parker & Joe Green >>
- 55 comments
- 1683 reads


